India’s Non-Linear Engagement in the Region:
Abstract
This article delves into the broader geo-strategic positioning of India against the backdrop of the brewing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.
As the Israel-Hamas conflict rages on, India’s dehyphenation policy calls for valuing independent relationships with Israelis and Palestinians on their merit.
As reflected in her latest statements in the UN Security Council, India unequivocally hit upon the need for the resumption of direct dialogue and the overall de-escalation of tensions.
Interestingly, India’s present diplomatic approach to the crisis remains largely debatable. India’s unique historical context gives it the sum and substance, especially against the backdrop of growing multilateralism.
An erstwhile champion of the Palestinian cause, as reflected by its opposition to the “Two-State” solution spearheaded by the United Nations, India granted recognition to the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO), to the extent of giving full diplomatic status in 1980, coupled with her widespread objection to Israel’s construction of a wall along the West Bank in 2003,
Moreover, her unwavering commitment to her notion of a “balancing act”, rooted in pragmatism and non-alignment has become a significant driver in its involvement.
Viewing the conflict through the lens
of the Indian Diplomatic Context
Accentuated by significant Israeli support, the trend is clear. A mature understanding and reflection within the realm of humanitarian law is the need of the hour.
As enunciated by MEA Spokesperson, Arindam Bagchi, when he draws on the context of “an adoption of a global responsibility to fight the menace of cross-border terrorism in all its forms and manifestations”, multilateral dialogue at various international for a, can significantly ease brewing tensions.
In this regard, the consequent projection of an image of a “global moderator”, has been the bedrock of India’s global and regional credibility. Its voice in proxy wars in Israel, the Arab States or Iran, is reflective of not only her reliance on foreign energy sources but also her broader endeavour to stabilize economic, strategic, institutional and people-to-people ties, in the Middle Eastern region.
The “Balancing Act” Ordeal and the Road to Diplomatic Dexterity:
A Nuanced Stand on the Conflict
There has been a considerable shift from India’s pro-Palestine belief to a neutral one in the present times. India’s commitment diplomatic approach towards the Israel-Palestine conflict is characterised by a delicate balancing act.
On one hand, India maintains strong historical and cultural ties with the Palestinian people and has been a supporter of their aspirations for self-determination and statehood. On the other, she has also nurtured a deepening relationship with Israel, including in areas such as defence, agriculture, technology, and trade.
In line with her nuanced international commitments, India’s protracted engagement with the conflict dates back to its struggle against colonialism and apartheid. As one of the founding members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in 1961, she expressed support for Palestinian self-determination and strongly condemned Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories.
This support was further emphasized by India’s recognition of Palestine as a state in 1988.
However, at the same time, India began to establish closer ties with Israel, primarily in the areas of defence and security cooperation. In the 1990s, India and Israel forged bilateral agreements on defence, intelligence sharing, and counter-terrorism.
Shift in India’s Geo-strategic Commitments:
Conclusion
Analyzing the impact of the war on India, it can have several implications. India exports military and defence equipment and technology cooperation from Israel amounting to $1.2 billion in 2022. As the conflict continues, Israel might focus more on its internal security obligations thus jeopardizing India’s needs in the defense sector. India being an importer of oil from the Middle East, any escalation might affect oil prices directly impacting her economy. The ongoing conflict might prove to be a stone in India’s path to integrate trade with Europe through its ambitious India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor.
Her unique position in the world order and its increasing influence in the existing frame of multilateralism can help India play a constructive role in promoting diplomacy and dialogue between the two parties based on the two-nation theory. India can yield its soft power and encourage dialogues and exchanges between different cultural groups, academia and youth of the region to promote trust and understanding.
Bibliography
Kugelman, Michael. 2023. “Will India Draw Closer to Israel?” Foreign Policy. October 12. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/10/11/india-israel-hamas-war-diplomacy-palestine/.
Blarel, Nicolas. “Modi looks West? Assessing change and continuity in India’s Middle East policy since 2014.” International Politics 59, no. 1 (2022): 90-111.
Saranya, Antony A. “India-Israel Relations: The Palestine Factor and De-Hyphenation Approach.” IUP Journal of International Relations https://toda.org/global-outlook/2023/indias-balancing-act-limited-liability-partnership.html17, no. 1 (2023): 20-41.
Wheeler, Tom, and Alan Z. Rozenshtein. 2015. “How India Can Maintain Its Delicate Israel-Palestine Balancing Act.” Brookings. November 3. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-india-can-maintain-its-delicate-israel-palestine-balancing-act/.
Wulf, Herbert. 2023. “India’s Balancing Act: ‘Limited Liability Partnership.’” Toda Peace Institute. October 31. https://toda.org/global-outlook/2023/indias-balancing-act-limited-liability-partnership.html.
GUPTA is a student at Miranda House, University of Delhi, India. Currently pursuing Economics, she is hardworking and passion-driven with interests ranging from international relations, and trade to developmental economics.
Rightly said.You have shown India’s stand perfectly.